WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
37%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



wansteadman 9:30 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
Funny when we had that bloke off the telly investigating blatter and warner over bribery and corruption it was swept under the carpet. Suddenly we buy him lunch and suddenly we are accused of bribery

Willtell 8:59 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
I cannot believe this non-profit organisation actually has more than $1bn in the bank!!!!

No wonder it's corrupt...

Mr Polite 8:53 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
What is the betting FBI Agent Dave Blatter finds no evidence of corruption?

ted fenton 8:41 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30044791

PistonHammered 2:38 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
Where there's big money there is corruption.


Football is small cheese, imagine the corruption and lies at government levels.

les marteaux 2:08 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
If the big countries decided to ban all products that have sponsorship deals with FIFA. They would choke off the supply of bribery money.

les marteaux 2:08 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
If the big countries decided to ban all products that have sponsorship deals with FIFA. They would choke off the supply of bribery money.

Baggins 1:51 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
This thing with the FBI and Chuck Blazer seems to be gathering momentum. Hopefully they may have some success.

Gavros 1:45 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
I think Garcia hasn't been the yes man they expected him to be. He had a history of doing some whitewash work, that's why they appointed him. I recall some articles saying he'd do the same for them. Fair play on him - whether of his own accord or whether he's got the FBI breathing down his neck - he's blown their cover.

Takashi Miike 1:24 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
maybe one of the 'members' will one day be brave enough to drop the cunts in the shit, you'd have to be brave to do so

Takashi Miike 1:23 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
they're like the mafia but they don't even try and hide the corruption. you have to think that the police are on the payroll somehow the way the cunts just continue to flout the rules. im sure I once heard someone say in an interview that blatter sees himself as a pope like figure and fifa's headquarters as the equivalent of the vatican

Baggins 1:19 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
Gav - They built a 'GOAL' project brand new footy centre in the Caribbean somewhere, cost a fair few quid. The land it was built on (previously just a waste land shithole) absolutely rocketed in value, obviously......a journalist did a bit of digging and found out the land was owned by a certain Mr J Warner.

They really all just don't give a shit. Corrupt fuckers.

Gavros 12:16 Fri Nov 14
Re: fifa, not bent after all
To be frank I think bungs surrounding world cup votes just scratches the surface of this. FIFA have ten billion dollars in savings in the bank, a sum that puts it above most countries central bank foreign exchange reserves. It gives out billions in 'charity' payments to mainly emerging countries each year, with little to no transparency as to where the money ends up. If you're the FIFA representative in one of those counties, where does that put you in terms of being able to funnel the money to the 'right' project, in return for a bung?

Hermit Road 11:35 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
The FA deserve a kicking for currying favour with the crook Warner, a man who hates England anyway.

Having said that, FIFA are in no position to be giving them the kicking.

Seamus 10:55 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
http://www.rferl.org/content/soccer-world-cup-fifa-corruption-blatter-jennings/25414033.html

Try this one..

Sorry

Gavros 10:51 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
that's not an actual link Seamus

Seamus 10:48 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
Interesting piece on how corrupt FIFA are here...

http://www.rferl.org/content/soccer-.../25414033.html


"I think they are a bunch of gangsters, I don't trust them, and I don't think anybody should"

SLC 10:47 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
FIFA remind me of the Tories.

Jonah Lomas 10:43 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
It's not just England though Gav, they've found fault with EVERYONE, except Qatar and Russia.

Obviously, they've simply rewarded those countries for their "clean" bids.

Gavros 10:36 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
well as far as Im concerned, by trying to single out England in terms of practice, FIFA are trying to tell nation states that they are stronger than them, and that transgressors will be punished. The absolute fucking cheek of it. I think that the FA, and more importantly, Parliament, should be stepping in on this. These cunts need a good fucking leathering.

Arko 10:33 Thu Nov 13
Re: fifa, not bent after all
I don't think nations will be bold enough to boycott FIFA and not send their national sides to tournaments, but fans can try their best to ignore the thing: Don't buy tickets, don't watch the games on telly, massive screens in public places or on the Internet.

Plus people could do their utmost to boycott the FIFA sponsors for those tournaments as best as they can.

I tend to care more about club football these days anyway...

Prev - Page 2 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: